Honest comparison · Austria

FMS alternative — a cloud-native dispatch platform German and DACH fleets can run themselves.

TaxiCloud vs FMS: a cloud-native dispatch console with a generative AI Copilot, your own white-label rider app instead of the taxi.eu brand, and published month-to-month pricing — PBefG-aware and TSE-ready for German and DACH fleets.

Start free trial →

TaxiCloud

From £49/mo

Self-serve trial · month-to-month

FMS

Quote only

Sales-led · centrale deployment

TaxiCloud is the cloud-native alternative to an FMS/Austrosoft centrale for German and DACH Taxi- und Mietwagen fleets. FMS is a deep, full-stack incumbent — in-car hardware, dispatch, billing, and the taxi.eu network — but it is a centrale-era, hardware-coupled system whose consumer demand carries the taxi.eu brand rather than yours. TaxiCloud adds a generative AI Copilot, your own white-label rider app, and published month-to-month pricing.

Where FMS and the taxi.eu stack still win

FMS (operating through Austrosoft and fms) has anchored DACH taxi dispatch for over three decades, and the breadth shows: in-car terminals, dispatch, billing, driver and passenger apps, cloud-TSE fiscal records, and the taxi.eu network that makes roughly nine in ten German taxis bookable from one app. For a Zentrale that already runs FMS hardware, the stack is coherent and the German fiscal compliance is genuinely deep. The trade-off is architectural — a centrale-and-hardware model rather than a multi-tenant cloud platform, sales-led deployment rather than self-serve, and a demand funnel that builds the taxi.eu brand rather than the individual operator's.

How TaxiCloud differs from an FMS centrale

TaxiCloud is built cloud-native and operator-first. The dispatch console runs in any browser with no in-car hardware dependency, and the AI Copilot is generative rather than rule-based: it watches the live board, ranks reassignments by ETA and revenue, drafts rider messages, and explains each recommendation in plain German or English. PBefG is treated as a dispatch attribute — taxis run the metered Pflichtfahrgebiet tariff while Mietwagen carry the §49 return-to-base rule, in one console without breaking either regime. The pricing and reporting layer emits TSE-signed, GoBD-ready fare records, so month-end is a download.

FMS pricing vs TaxiCloud's published plans

The commercial model is the clearest contrast. FMS is quote-only and hardware-coupled; TaxiCloud publishes its plans, ships white-label rider and driver apps under the operator's own brand, and runs month-to-month with a self-serve trial. A German fleet can stand up a German-language console, driver app, and rider booking flow and evaluate the full platform in hours rather than scheduling a centrale sales cycle — while keeping its taxi.eu listing during the transition if it chooses.

Side-by-side

TaxiCloud vs FMS taxi dispatch software, capability by capability.

Cloud-native, multi-tenant console
TaxiCloud
FMS
AI Copilot in live dispatch (generative)
TaxiCloud
FMS
Operator's own white-label rider app
TaxiCloud
FMS
Published self-serve pricing
TaxiCloud
FMS
Self-serve trial
TaxiCloud
FMS
No in-car hardware lock-in
TaxiCloud
FMS
PBefG / §49 Taxi–Mietwagen separation
TaxiCloud
FMS
TSE / KassenSichV fiscal records
TaxiCloud
FMS
Open API + webhooks
TaxiCloud
FMS
Live WebSocket updates
TaxiCloud
FMS
Month-to-month contracts
TaxiCloud
FMS

Capability	TaxiCloud	FMS
Cloud-native, multi-tenant console
AI Copilot in live dispatch (generative)
Operator's own white-label rider app
Published self-serve pricing
Self-serve trial
No in-car hardware lock-in
PBefG / §49 Taxi–Mietwagen separation
TSE / KassenSichV fiscal records
Open API + webhooks
Live WebSocket updates
Month-to-month contracts

Spotted a row that's out of date? Email [email protected] and we'll update within one business day.

Where each platform wins

FMS vs TaxiCloud — the honest verdict.

Where FMS wins

Pick FMS when…

35+ years of dispatch heritage across 165+ central offices in ~11 countries
Full stack from one source — in-car hardware, dispatch, billing and apps
Owns the taxi.eu consumer network, a real distribution moat in Germany
Deep German fiscal compliance — cloud-TSE / KassenSichV fare records

Where TaxiCloud wins

Pick TaxiCloud when…

You want a cloud-native, multi-tenant platform rather than a hardware-coupled Zentrale system
You want published, self-serve pricing instead of a sales-led centrale quote
You want a generative AI Copilot in the live console, not rule-based auto-dispatch
You want your own branded rider app rather than funnelling demand into the taxi.eu brand

FMS alternative FAQ

FMS alternative — taxi dispatch software questions answered.

Is TaxiCloud a real alternative to an FMS centrale for a German fleet?: Yes. TaxiCloud runs PBefG-aware dispatch — metered Pflichtfahrgebiet tariffs for taxis and the §49 return-to-base rule for Mietwagen — in a cloud console with TSE/GoBD-ready fiscal exports, plus a generative AI Copilot and your own white-label rider app. The biggest difference is that it is multi-tenant cloud software with no in-car hardware lock-in, not a centrale-and-terminal deployment.
Does switching from FMS mean leaving the taxi.eu network?: Not necessarily. taxi.eu is a consumer booking network; a fleet can keep its taxi.eu listing for that demand channel while running TaxiCloud as its own operator platform and shipping its own branded rider app. The point of TaxiCloud is that the operator owns the brand, the data, and the dispatch logic rather than funnelling everything into a shared network app.
Is TaxiCloud TSE- and KassenSichV-compliant like FMS?: Yes. The pricing and reporting layer produces signed, audit-ready fare records and GoBD-compliant exports for the Steuerberater, so a German fleet meets the Kassensicherungsverordnung requirements FMS also covers.
How does FMS pricing compare to TaxiCloud?: FMS is quote-only, sales-led, and tied to in-car hardware. TaxiCloud publishes its plans and runs month-to-month with a self-serve trial and no hardware dependency, so the evaluation friction is hours rather than a centrale procurement cycle.